PSO Case Law: Gooden v. CVS Caremark Corp

Gooden v. CVS Caremark Corp, No. 11CVA-10885 (Nov. 20, 2012)

A Franklin Ohio County court upheld the protection provided for patient safety work product (PSWP) under the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act. The plaintiff’s attorney requested an incident report from a CVS Pharmacy, arguing that the protection did not apply as the defendants had admitted liability. The defendants argued that Congress intended to improve the quality of patient care by creating a culture of safety¬Ě through a non-punitive voluntary reporting system. This broader interpretation of the Act requires that the privilege be extended even if liability has been admitted.The court ruled that the PSO protection applied, and the plaintiff’s request was denied.

Summary provided by Center for Patient Safety Project Manager, Kathy Wire, JD, MBA, CPHRM.

BLOG:

PSO Case Law: Ungurian v. Beyzman, et al., 2020 PA Super 105:

A recent Pennsylvania case shows how courts narrowly interpret the PSQIA, ignoring the D & A pathway and the clear language of the Final Rule. (Ungurian v. Beyzman, et al., 2020 PA Super 105). The cour

Joint Commission New Sentinel Event Alert 61: Managing the Risks of Direct Oral Anticoagulants:

The Center for Patient Safety wants to share this important harm-prevention advice from The Joint Commission and its Sentinel Event Alert: Managing the Risks of Direct Oral Anticoagulants. The Joint Commis

CPS Safety Watch/Alert – Culture Can Improve the Control of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms:

Issue: A number of events reported co CPS’ Patient Safety Organization (PSO) demonstrate poor handoff communication about the patients’ infectious disease status Examples include: Patient with

Read More

RESOURCES:

The Center for Patient Safety believes that collaboration and sharing are the best ways to drive improvement. We strive to provide the right solutions and resources to improve healthcare safety and quality.